Choose a plugin
Start from the outcome, not the model.
| I need to… | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Roto, key, track, relight, restore, extend, or reconstruct a shot | mere-vfx-tools | Shot-oriented workflows and verified production handoffs |
| Cut a subject out of a still | mere-image-tools | Focused SAM 3.1 knockout and matte cleanup |
| Play a local generative music model live | mere-perform | MIDI, stage UI, prompt control, logs, and capture |
| Build shot, character, voice, or delivery kits | mere-animatic-tools | Animatic-specific artifact bundles |
| Publish local artifacts for production review | mere-shotgrid-tools | Versions, uploads, Notes, Playlists, and task updates |
| Train a Klein LoRA on rented GPUs | mere-runpod | Planned user-owned pods, artifact fetch, cleanup by default |
| OCR and redact a document | mere-doc-tools | Local OCR plus optional local anonymization |
| Scrub text and PII across frames | mere-media-scrub | Resumable frame-batch privacy workflow |
| Caption a LoRA dataset | mere-dataset-tools | Captions, OCR sidecars, trigger tokens, contact sheet |
| Transcribe and redact audio | mere-transcript-tools | Local ASR plus optional anonymization |
| Repeat an image generation composition | mere-image-compose | Records prompt, references, LoRA, dimensions, seed, and output |
| Run many explicit core commands | mere-batch-runner | Durable JSONL job status and resumability |
Narrow or broad?
Prefer the narrowest plugin that owns the whole workflow. For a single still knockout, Image Tools is simpler than VFX Tools. For a shot that needs roto, tracking, alpha delivery, and QC, VFX Tools owns the larger lifecycle.
Local or provider-backed?
Eleven catalog commands operate locally. RunPod Runner is provider-backed and therefore has stronger planning and cleanup obligations. Read Provider safety before creating paid resources.